Either Side of The Coin

Two Leaders, Both Ambitions, Unified by Iraq (Hopefully)

Reputed as big influence in world and Middle East politics, both U.S. President George W Bush and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad now have big opportunity to mediate their differences of all things (including Israel, maybe), thanks to their attention and big scheme on Iraq.
Wahta Bush thinks about Iran dan vise versa is completely different in so much manner. Bush suspects Iran try to develop nuclear weapon in covert of uranium enrichment program, something Ahmadinejad denies. On the contrary, Ahmadinejad accuses Bush only defend Israel's big interest to be the only nuclear state in Middle East. But Ahmadinejad knows well that Israel poses nuclear warheads and it means a threat to entire region. Israel never denies or admits it.
But Bush knows better how to serve Israel's interest without Iran interrupting America's foreign policy in the region, and to create 'bumper states' around the Jewsh.
It sounds ironic, when world crises escalate and the risk of world war III to explode, U.S. still maintain its repressive policy on Iran because the Mullah State have the right to develop nuclear energy as one of non proliferation treaty countries.
Apart from their different view, it will be wise if Mr Bush and Mr Ahmadinejad share their vision on how to manipulate nuclear energy at round-table negotiation. No one ia above the other.
With great respect to Iraq, U.S. and Iran will be able to find same solution for civil war ridden country. Bush should volutarily accept Ahmadinejad regime as influencing power on Iraq's Shiite and can give Iran the rights of nuclear research and development under IAEA rules. What makes them so stiff so far?